Eight Decades of Insights – 12

Every civilization is built on a foundation of words. Words are (or were) the measure of a person. As I was growing up in small mill town in Western Pennsylvania, I learned you judged people by how good their “word” was. Wealth, talent, strength, the car you drove, and the girls you dated were important, but nothing was as valuable as the reliability of your word. Your reputation in all fields depended upon the integrity of your word. Once that was gone, it was nearly impossible to get it back. I submit that it is the same with nations, political parties, politicians, and leaders.

I don’t believe that modern-day politicians value the integrity of the words they speak and print. This is dangerous; without truth and honesty, our freedom is at risk. The end does not justify the means. Administrations based on the principles espoused by Lenin, Goebbels, or Alinsky have not lasted. On the extreme right, we find dictatorship of the oligarchies; on the extreme left we find equally ugly dictatorships. Both use words or propaganda to further their goals. The truth does not matter to them. It is good to distort the truth as long as the lies promote the end. The end in political terms is the goal of creating a just and fair society where the rulers know what the people need and use whatever means are necessary to achieve and protect their utopia.

History has seen many examples of a few believing they – not the people – know best. How did that work for the Nazis, the various communist regimes, experiments in socialism and  Islam,  and for several other ancient empires? They did not leave much behind, except fading memories of ugly repression. None of them could stand the truth. They all used words to further their causes and beliefs. The theory that “the end justifies the means” reigned supreme. Freedom is the final casualty when words are only a means to an end. How can you believe anyone, especially a politician struggling to hold on to power, who doesn’t care or even think about the consistency of his word?

The word of the leaders of a great nation, like the United States, both in domestic areas and foreign affairs must carry the weight of truth and conviction. When leaders change positions, not because of a changed conviction, but merely to support a more expedient political policy, the power of their word is lost. Their conviction is suspect. Foreign powers study the words of our leaders. When they see no consistency or willingness to back words and convictions with action, they will disregard the words of our leaders. Our friends will no longer trust us.  The possible examples are nearly unlimited but here are a few.

Remember our secretary of state saving she viewed Assad of Syria as a reformer and only months later was calling for him to abdicate? Remember the president changing words, without a believable change in conviction, over tax issues, war strategy, medical care, and budget issues?

The end justifying the means is the most probable explanation. What does their word mean?  Can you trust it?  Reading the words of Saul Alinsky, a radical revolutionary writer and former Community Organizer in Chicago, will help you understand. Both our president and secretary of state are familiar with Mr. Alinsksy’s writing. Maybe you should be also.

Leave a comment

Filed under Alinsky, General, Intelligence & Politics, Politics

Eight Decades of Insights – 11

My motivation in starting this blog was to publicize my novels. Along the way I couldn’t resist discussing other topics. But this blog, 11, is dedicated  to fiction that carries several messages.

The first novel was titled JUSTICE BEYOND LAWMy second novel is called JUSTICE WITHOUT MERCY.  Both are  thrillers about a group of people who take extreme measures to combat terrorism with little regard for political correctness. JUSTICE WITHOUT MERCY will be available worldwide in a few weeks. Both books are or will be available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble in both print and as ebooks using Kindle and the Nook. Several professionals with military or intelligence backgrounds have given me a thumbs up. Below is the prologue for my second novel.

JUSTICE WITHOUT MERCY © 

ANOTHER JACK BRANDON THRILLER

By Barry Kelly

PROLOGUE

Five years ago Joel Hankins, known in the camps as Mohammed Abu Moussa, finished his training at the camp for foreign fighters in Afghanistan. He learned to handle most small arms and explosives but was near the bottom of his trainee group of twenty. His strength and toughness were not equal to the rest of the trainees.  The camp was above nine thousand feet with very little vegetation. They lived in caves and were never really warm at night in the winter months.  The people they lived among were incredibly poor. Every disease in the mountains of South Asia was visible in the small village near the training site. Even so, his experience at that camp was the highlight of his life. He was someone, someone special. He wasn’t the loser everyone said he was in Pittsburgh. He had even met Usama Bin Laden

Just before he left the camp his leaders told him that they had been searching for months to find a westerner of the true faith to help carry Jihad to America. Joel wasn’t sure of the true faith, but he did pray at least twice a day and spent another hour each day reading the Koran.  He had grown comfortable with the teachings of the Prophet and was proud to be a part of the holy war to establish a Muslim Empire that someday would include the United States.

His leaders knew they were not strong enough to have their own sovereign nation in the face of the forces aligned against them. Control of territory was necessary to recruit and train followers. In Joel’s training group there had been students from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Palestine, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia and several western nations. If the Taliban could not hold Afghanistan, where could the faithful train and plan damaging attacks against the infidel nations? Joel was happy he had been assigned to help locate a place within the United States where faithful Jihadists could find safe haven.

Before he left Afghanistan, he was taken to a compound in Peshawar and left in the care of a Palestinian trainer.  This man was an expert with real experience in clandestine operations. The trainer told Joel that in the next three weeks he had to be ready for his assignment in America. He was told to forget his Muslim name. While he was in America his name would be his own, Joel Hankins from Pittsburgh, PA. When his training was over, he would return to Pittsburgh and tell his family he was done traveling around the world and wanted to prepare himself for a career in business.  At first Joel objected to this plan but his mentor, a powerful man with intense dark eyes, told him there was no room for dissent. He had been chosen and he would follow orders, or he would never leave the compound alive.

Joel never doubted that Hakim meant every word he said. Putting on his most respectful look, Joel said he would obey and carry out any mission assigned to him. During the next three weeks, Joel was given intensive instruction in the methods of planning, supporting and carrying out terrorist activities in the United States. He had always been good at detail, and soon reached a level of competence that surprised Hakim. In the last week, Joel learned how to deal with hostile interrogations and to prepare cover stories for everything associated with terrorist operations. His first mission was to establish a rug merchant shop in Charleston, SC. The necessary money would be deposited in his name in a Charleston bank. 

After Joel satisfied Hakim with his ability to use the tradecraft of espionage, he was delivered to a Taliban supporter in Peshawar who operated a rug manufacturing and export business. Another two months were spent learning how to appraise and sell rugs. From time to time, Hakim would drop by and give Joel a mission to accomplish. Joel never knew whether the mission was for real or practice. 

When Joel left Peshawar, he had lost all the trappings of a devoted Jihadist. His thin blond hair was cut short in the style of young Western businessmen. His beard was gone and his new clothes tailored to his scrawny build.  With his light blue eyes, wind-burned acne face and wearing his first tailored suit, he was ready to return to Pittsburgh where he had a personal mission and then on to Charleston.  His long stay in Pakistan was covered by his learning the art of dealing in Oriental rugs. A hundred rugs were sent in his name to a holding address in Charleston as further evidence of his status as a rug dealer.

It had been two years since Joel left Pittsburgh for Pakistan and Afghanistan. Getting off the Greyhound bus at the downtown terminal on a sunny October day, Joel decided he wasn’t going home. His mother died while he was with the Taliban. He hated his father and only wanted to see him one more time, to kill him. Killing didn’t require any talk. Joel also had a mental list of girls he knew in Schenley High School whovhad laughed at his advances and talked about him behind his back. Shirley Bronson and Sally Hartley were the worst. Joel planned to look them up and see if they could still laugh when he was finished with them. His growing lust to kill young women was one thing he had never disclosed to his Muslim contacts. Now that he had the killing skills and the training to avoid being caught, he was ready to start.

Joel took a local bus out to a poorer section of Oakland and paid cash for a room at a rundown boarding house.  No questions asked. Just cash in advance. Two days later he paid cash for a high-mileage 2000 model Dodge van. He wouldn’t kill his no-account father on this trip. No sense in giving the cops something to work on by getting the Hankins’ name involved. Four days later, he had killed both girls.

 It was easy. They were both students at Pitt and lived at home with their parents.  In two days he had their after-school schedules down pat. Both worked in the University’s library week nights and walked home together just after ten o’clock. His first try failed. Too many bystanders were close to his selected ambush site. He had learned patience. The next day Joel parked his dark blue van at another site along their route home. When the girls passed his parked Dodge van laughing and talking, Joel slipped out of the shadows behind them and slammed their heads together. Holding them up, he used his remote to open the side door and shoved the stunned girls inside. There were no lights on in the van. Pulling the right fuses had fixed that. In the darkness after gagging them, he put cloth bags over their heads and duct taped their hands and legs.

Just before midnight, Joel dumped their naked bodies in a wooded area of Schenley Park. He kept their clothes. Along with the photos he took while torturing them, he had a good start on his collection. With both girls his clumsiness caused him to miss the moment of death. The next time he would do better. 

 Early the next morning he got in his van and left for Charleston. He loved the news coverage. The killings made the front pages of the Pittsburgh papers and the evening news on the networks. With his new knowledge and training, it was easy to outwit the police. There was no evidence he had returned to Pittsburgh, and he left no evidence behind. Those feel-good murders were his business. His al Qaeda leaders didn’t need to know.

Two years later, Joel’s rug shop in Charleston was making a little money. He had found an ideal place for the shop in a rundown building on the western end of Meeting Street. It had an apartment above the shop and a two-story, three-car garage in the back with space on the second level for two bedrooms, a bath and kitchen with a small sitting area. It was enough to house four or five people for short periods. 

Three or four times a year, an al Qaeda courier stopped in his shop to deliver instructions and wait for Joel to write a response. He had no electronic communications with al Qaeda. They used a simple code based on a particular edition of the King James version of the Bible.

 Life was good. Joel continued the training regime he learned in the camps and joined a shooting club. At least twice a week, he took private Taekwondo lessons. Within a few months he would test for his blue belt.  He was no longer the scrawny kid that left Peshawar two and a half years ago.  

Joel made time for his passion for thrill killing, but he never killed in Charleston. His training had taught him the importance of patience and attention to detail. He set no pattern in his kills, except that his victims were all attractive young girls. No weapons were used to kill them. Joel never killed in any city more than once a year. He was addicted to the feeling of power he got from killing. He would take his prey his own way while he was young and alive.  There was no rush like watching the light fade in his victims’ eyes. No one would ever have these bitches.  In a few cases he had been lucky enough to catch the moment with his digital camera.  Too bad he had to keep the images hidden.  Rug business trips provided all the cover he needed for visiting other cities. The urges were becoming stronger.  It was about time that he made a hunting trip to Myrtle Beach.

LIES ARE A TRAP, NOT A DECEPTION

bk

1 Comment

Filed under Action thrillers, Afghanistan, Books, class warfare, Conservative views, Intelligence & Politics, Spy novels

Eight Decades of Insights – 10

This November, we will have a chance to exercise our freedom of choice at the polling places. Important principles will be identified on the left and on the right and our positions on those principles will determine our vote. In a true republic, contesting adversaries usually must compromise on some of their  principles.  This is only possible when the voter recognizes that all principles are not equal. Some cannot be compromised. Others can. The hard part is deciding where you stand.

I have thought my  position through. I’m basically a right/center conservative who will, at times, chose to vote a split ticket. There is no perfect candidate for any office. Sorry about that. When Barack Obama was elected, I was proud of my country for electing a black man as president. Not that I voted for him. He did not fit my requirements  for a president. I served in the White House under President Reagan and it is not a position where learning on the job is a viable option. Without significant leadership and management experience, no one can succeed as president. Experience as a community organizer, state senator,  a two-year member of the Senate, and four years campaigning from the White House just does not prepare you for the job , no matter how intelligent you may be. Enough about that.

Back to the hard part. Where do you stand? Where can you compromise? What is your ranking of governing principles? Below are 20 questions I believe are worth considering before November 2012. There is nothing scientific about these questions or the order in which they are presented. They don’t even reflect my own order of political  principles. Below I have presented the number of yes votes as a means for you to classify where you fit in the political spectrum from the far right to the far left. No scientific process here. It is all subjective and you can do your own scoring.

1. DO YOU BELIEVE THE FREE MARKET WITH LIMITED GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IS PREFERABLE TO A  GOVERNMENT MANAGED ECONOMY?

2. DO YOU BELIEVE OUR CURRENT DEBT IS A NATIONAL CRISES AND WE SHOULD TAKE  IMMEDIATE STEPS TO END BORROWING AND PAY DOWN THE DEBT?

3. DO YOU BELIEVE THE CURRENT CORPORATE TAX RATE SHOULD BE LOWERED TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE RENEWAL OF MANUFACTURING IN THE UNITED STATES?

4.  DO YOU BELIEVE EVERY PERSON WITH AN INCOME ABOVE MINIMUM WAGE LEVELS SHOULD PAY SOME FEDERAL INCOME TAX?

5. DO YOU BELIEVE A VOTER I.D. REQUIREMENT SHOULD BE UP TO THE STATES?

6. DO YOU BELIEVE FREEDOM REQUIRES ETERNAL VIGILANCE AND BIG GOVERNMENT PRESENTS A BIGGER THREAT TO INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM THAN A MORE LIMITED GOVERNMENT?

7. DO YOU BELIEVE OUR CURRENT  INCOME TAX  CODE NEEDS TO BE REVISED?

8. DO YOU BELIEVE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNIONS  SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONDUCT  COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR SALARY AND BENEFITS?

9. DO YOU BELIEVE ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS  NEED TO BE REVISED TO ENSURE SOLVENCY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS?

10. DO YOU BELIEVE COURTS SHOULD INTERPRET AND ADJUDICATE EXISTING LAW VERSUS MAKING LAW?

11. DO YOU BELIEVE TERM LIMITS FOR LEGISLATORS  WOULD IMPROVE THEIR RESPONSIVENESS TO THEIR CONSTITUENCIES?

12. DO YOU BELIEVE IN MAINTAINING A STRONG MILITARY?

13. DO YOU BELIEVE WHILE ALL PEOPLE ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW, THEY HAVE VASTLY DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ABILITY?

14. DO YOU BELIEVE GOVERNMENT SPENDING IS  THE WRONG WAY TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT?

15. DO YOU BELIEVE THE RECENT LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION ON INDUSTRY SLOWS ECONOMIC GROWTH?

16. DO YOU BELIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AT ANY LEVEL, SHOULD NOT EXCLUSIVELY TEACH PARTISAN VIEWS, EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT?

17. DO YOU BELIEVE THE RIGHTS OF STATES TO GOVERN SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM FEDERAL INCURSIONS?

18. DO YOU BELIEVE OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED FOR ALL CITIZENS?

19. DO YOU BELIEVE WE NEED TO HAVE AN ENERGY POLICY TO INCREASE FOSSIL FUEL DEVELOPMENT NOW WHIIE CONDUCTING BASIC RESEARCH TO FIND OTHER FORMS OF ENERGY?

20. DO YOU BELIEVE THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM SHOULD BE TRANSPARENT AND RESPONSIVE  TO CONGRESSIONAL GUIDELINES? 

If you have  16 to 20 yes answers, you are a strong conservative. I judge a score of 12 to 16 yes answers puts you in the right of center wing.  If  your yes answers are less than five I think you can call yourself far left. My guess is a score of 6 to 10 yes answers puts you in the political center. Remember, this process is subjective. If you don’t like the results change the range of numbers. The important thing is that you consider  these principles and some I’ve missed before you vote. We  must find a working center in the next administration. We have historically been a slightly right of center people. We can govern from there and let the political fringes have their say.

1 Comment

Filed under political solutions, Politics

Eight Decades of Insights – 9

Afghanistan. Yes, it is time to pack up and come home. The original mission was  to drive out the Taliban and deny Afghanistan as a training/staging site for al Qaeda. Five hundred or so CIA , Special Forces troops, plus the fighters of  the Northern Alliance assisted by the firepower of the US Air Force and Navy did exactly that years ago. War over. Mission accomplished. Leave some Special Forces and CIA personnel in country and focus on other strategic problems.

But no. Then the liberal politicians took over. Iraq was a mistake, they said. Afghanistan is the “good war.” Get the troops out of Iraq and surge our force in Afghanistan. Develop a nation-building strategy, for that is required by the new mission. Wait a minute, didn’t we try some of that in Vietnam? Our military forces, even though frustrated by archaic rules of engagement, never lost a firefight, much less a battle. In war, our uniformed men and women do very well. No one is better. But nation building is another thing. We don’t do that. No one trains in the skills, whatever they are, for nation building. If there wasn’t a nation there to start with, there will not be one when we quit trying. I know. I was there. Corrupt leaders ruling by military and police forces do not a nation make.

Alexander the Great, and his mixed  force from conquered  lands, once invaded and ruled Afghanistan but he did not make it a nation. And history does not tell us much about his success and tactics. Later, the British and Russians tried to invade and rule Afghanistan. Invading they found easy. Ruling was hard. They both left beaten and bloody. The Afghan tribes are not, never have been, and today are not ready to submit to a centralized government. Just ask the Pakistanis. How well have they have managed or extended their national authority to their tribal areas? Karzai is corrupt and with or without our military forces, he and his “centralized” government will not last.

Failure to succeed at nation building in Afghanistan cannot be blamed on U.S. military forces. They are the best. Just don’t expect them to create a nation out of tribes. Political authority that sees the world as they want or believe it to be rather than how it is should not expect anything but failure. Afghanistan is a near perfect example of “mission creep” and political expediency snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It’s time to leave. Do not spend anymore blood and treasure on mindless political objectives. Leave the course of Afghanistan to the tribes, and our intelligence people and Special Forces, none of whom are interested in nation building.  Afghanistan is not “the good war.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Afghanistan, Intelligence & Politics, political solutions, Politics, Uncategorized

Eight Decades of Insights – 8

I’ve noticed my ability to pontificate has increased with age. Since, at the same time, I believe I have some things to say, I’ll ignore this dangerous combination.  Pushing on through the twin perils of giving birth to boring text and unproven assertions, I decided to use my new skills to probe the next decade. No matter where I begin, the probe hits the barrier of political polarization just under the surface. The sharp divide along class lines and ideology that has arisen with Obama’s reign is not as dangerous to our way of life as the fissures leading to the Civil War or the War Between the States. Nomenclature is the responsibility of the reader.

It is nowhere close. Calls for class warfare and the redistribution of wealth will not lead to a clash of arms. The more reasonable and largest segment of our political spectrum is the Center. Who are tired of the ideological cries that ‘the sky is falling’ from the extreme left and right wings. President Obama is not an evil entity. He is merely an inept man clinging to a discarded ideology. With different life experiences, he might have made a fair to middling President. So far he has not done irreparable harm. Any pragmatic experienced leader/manager can get us back on track for his replacement will have a great force to assist him or her govern in 2012 or 2016.

The Center, consisting of moderates and pragmatists, can rally all Americans in the name of national survival. The financial crisis will focus our attention on the need to drastically cut spending and balance the national budget, leading to a much smaller national government. The Center knows the lessons of history. Keynesian economics, that believes government spending, even of borrowed money, can stimulate the national economy has never worked. Not for FDR and not for Obama. Americans have always been willing to make sacrifices in the name of national security and the well-being of the next generation. No fear, in the next four to eight years, the threat from irresponsible spending and borrowing will be clear to all. Well, maybe the ideologues on the far left will still debate using their own facts. But they will truly be voices in the wilderness.

Along with fiscal responsibility, an overhaul of the tax budget is necessary. A tax code that is understandable, progressive in nature, and drastically reduces the over 40% who pay no income taxes will alleviate the impact of the strident calls for class warfare and the anti-business rhetoric emanating from the Administration. Term limits on Congress are necessary to improve their responsiveness to the people they represent. Three terms for a Senator and five for House members seems both fair and pragmatic.

The next decade will bring a crisis in national defense. Probably very early in the decade. Again the citizens will rally behind the need for a strong military. The conflict with Islam militants will not go away until moderate followers of Islam put their own house in order. Their past record does not lead to much hope. Again the Center knows that peace comes through strength. Respect is a stronger force for influence in world politics than striving to be liked. The dangers of a nuclear Iran, a rogue Pakistan, an unmistakable growing militarism in China, a probable increasing radicalization of Islam, especially in the Middle East and a democracy killing leadership in Russia will motivate us to make the sacrifices necessary to defend our country and our friends. These threats will clearly expose The UN for what is has become, a forum for discussion of popular causes. At times nice to have, but not worth the disproportionate share of American dollars.

The next decade will see the United States become a major supplier of oil and natural gas and their derivative products. We are moving that way now. As soon as the fossil fuel hating bureaucracy is changed for a less ideological and more pragmatic regime our production of fuel will jump ahead. At the same time responsible investment in alternative sources of energy will be market driven with seed money from the national budget when necessary.

The free wheeling days of the Federal Reserve will come to an end. The printing of money and the unnatural  fixing of interest rates will require more than the deliberations of a group of experts meeting in secrecy. Another experiment that will run its course in the next ten years is the national control of education. It has not worked. The result has been a dumbing down of the educational system and the creation of the self-serving Teachers Union that has made a sham out of collective bargaining and failed to teach the nation’s children. The Department of Education will be abolished and replaced by a very small Presidential Advisory Council. The primary role of educating our children will be delegated to the States.

Two more important changes will occur.  A centrist government and those who elected it, will wonder if the government having more union members than the private sector is a good thing. The government union members have no skin in the game and really no  one with whom to conduct collective bargaining. Certainly the government bureaucrats on the other side of the table have no skin in the  game. In the private sector where real collective bargaining takes place as long as the government stays out of it are moving toward having a real stake in the company they work for. That’s a good thing. My last look into the future is in the area of medical care. Any government elected by the Center has to take on medical care of the people. There are pragmatic solutions. Using the forces of the market place to the extent possible is a starting point. Any system that allows patients to deal with their doctors and to have a say in the cost of their treatment will have an impact on pricing.

Obviously you cannot do justice to the next decade in a thousand words. But we all need to think about this coming election and concentrate on the real issues at stake. If not now, it will get harder and more dangerous later. It is time to begin.

Thank you to those who have read this.

Leave a comment

Filed under class warfare, Intelligence & Politics, political solutions, Politics